question: do you use the pen tool for selections or the lasso tool exclusively?
--
"A Jedi must have the deepest commitment, the most serious mind. ... This one a long time have I watched. Never his mind on where he was. Hmm? What he was doing. Hmph. Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things."
Very interesting comment Nielsteperdejong!
I also like this kind of weaponery and ancient war stuff..
well, my opinion... like you wrote, Katana is a slashing weapon, and you mean that those kind of weapons has no chance facing armors... but remember the Cruzades... islamic warriors used the same kind of slashing weapons (SCIMITARS) and they kicked the asses of european christians so many times as well they get kicked their owns not few...
So, what makes the true difference are other factors than the traditional kind of the swords, the armours, or the shileds that an army use...
I think that a samurai vs a chainmail knight are very similar and both has chances... samurais at war, in the battlefield does USED amours, and a very effectives ones... here the individual hability would be the definition point...
Plate armour is other subject. It was clearly the most advanced armour and a plate armour knight was very protected, but their movements and agility were restricted at the point that if they falls from their horses to earth, they were in disadvantage vs a knight with a hammer or some like that... for a samurai would be very hard to defeat the plate armour, but normally the samurai would be faster than the plate armour knight... again the personal inteligence and hability is the key...
and mongolians are on another level, they pwns whatever and all the people they want, chineses, nippons, europeans, arabs, etc when they want... but their empire ended soon because they were a crazy band of tribes with a weak politic organization... thast's a fact...
--
------------------------------------------- "La civilización no suprime la barbarie, la perfecciona..."
Now it's time for August 2008 Visual Art Features, many new art to discover!
Don't forget that many artists need to be viewed, they deserve it! Fave Fave Fave! My main purpose in doing a monthly feature about (to my point of view) 'the best visual art' is to put in the same level as well wellknown artists and popular creations as unknown artists and under-exposed creations. Artists need to be supported. So don't be shy!
Here's the Menu per Category :
Digital Paintings & Drawings | Mixed Media | PhotoManipulations | 3-Dimensional | Vector & Vexels | Photography | Traditional Paintings & Drawings | Artisan Crafts
With a gallery that takes you on a journey into another world, `spyroteknik has firmly secured a place as one of the top artists within our community. Always willing to participate in events as well as providing critique and guidance to members in such a humble yet inspiring manner is a quality which deserves recognition. So it's with great pleasure that we award this month's Deviousness to Martin Bland. Read More
Devious Comments
--
In this world you can not "be" anything it is only what you "do" that matters
--
Sarcasm better than killing people.
--
"A Jedi must have the deepest commitment, the most serious mind. ... This one a long time have I watched. Never his mind on where he was. Hmm? What he was doing. Hmph. Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things."
I also like this kind of weaponery and ancient war stuff..
well, my opinion... like you wrote, Katana is a slashing weapon, and you mean that those kind of weapons has no chance facing armors... but remember the Cruzades... islamic warriors used the same kind of slashing weapons (SCIMITARS) and they kicked the asses of european christians so many times as well they get kicked their owns not few...
So, what makes the true difference are other factors than the traditional kind of the swords, the armours, or the shileds that an army use...
I think that a samurai vs a chainmail knight are very similar and both has chances... samurais at war, in the battlefield does USED amours, and a very effectives ones... here the individual hability would be the definition point...
Plate armour is other subject. It was clearly the most advanced armour and a plate armour knight was very protected, but their movements and agility were restricted at the point that if they falls from their horses to earth, they were in disadvantage vs a knight with a hammer or some like that... for a samurai would be very hard to defeat the plate armour, but normally the samurai would be faster than the plate armour knight... again the personal inteligence and hability is the key...
and mongolians are on another level, they pwns whatever and all the people they want, chineses, nippons, europeans, arabs, etc when they want... but their empire ended soon because they were a crazy band of tribes with a weak politic organization... thast's a fact...
--
-------------------------------------------
"La civilización no suprime la barbarie, la perfecciona..."
Previous Page1234 Next Page